The University of Texas at Austin

Domain 5: Learning & Cognition

General Description

This domain is focused on theoretical and empirical studies of basic processes in psychology, and the application of such studies. Topics of major emphasis are:

Cognition

Psycholinguistics

Learning

Motivation

Instruction

Back to Top

Courses

For those who elect to fulfill the domain requirement by coursework, the following courses are currently approved. Students may take two primary courses from this list or one primary and one secondary course. However, certain combinations are not recommended in order to avoid an overly-narrow focus, as indicated below.

Detailed statements of the contents, objectives, and assigned reading for each course can be examined in the departmental office (SZB 504) or on the course descriptions webpage. Additional information can also be obtained from the instructor who teaches the course.

P/S EDP # Topic Usual Instructor
Primary 382L.1 Psychology of Learning Robinson
Primary 382L.2 Motivation and Emotion Wicker
Primary 382L.4 Instructional Psychology Svinicki
Primary 382L.5 Cognition and Behavior Wicker
Primary 382L.7 Psycholinguistics Schallert
Secondary 381.20 Cognitive Foundations of Psychotherapy Rude
Secondary 382.6 Psychology of Teachers and Teaching Graduate Faculty
Secondary 382L Current Topics in Motivation Wicker
Secondary 382L.8 Current Topics in Cognition Weinstein
Secondary 382L.10 Contemporary Theories of Discourse Comprehension Schallert
Secondary 382L.11 Theory and Practice of Writing Schallert
Secondary 382L.14 Psychology of Computers in Education Graduate Faculty
Secondary 382L.14 Communication and Language Graduate Faculty
Secondary 382L.14 Learning School-Based Cognitive Skills Graduate Faculty
Secondary 382L Current Topics in Motivation Wicker

Back to Top

Topics

Brief descriptions of the topics covered in Domain 5 courses are given below:

Primary Courses

Secondary Courses:

Back to Top

Domain Exam

For those who elect this avenue for fulfilling the domain requirement, the three-hour domain examination consists of four essay questions from which the student chooses and answers two. Of the four questions, two will cover the social psychology topics and two will cover the personality topics described above. The students must select and answer one social and one personality question. At least two faculty members who are familiar with the content of the questions will evaluate the responses and grade the exam on a Pass/Fail basis. If the Pass/Fail recommendations of the two readers differ, a third reader will evaluate the student’s responses and resolve the discrepancy. Students must pass both questions to be considered as having passed the domain exam. Students may not retake the exam if they do not pass: a student who fails the examination must satisfy the domain requirement by coursework.

Back to Top

Readings

Here are some references that may be helpful:

Cognition

Gardner, H. (1985). The mind's new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.

Anderson, J.R. (2000.) Cognitive psychology and its implications. Fifth Edition, New York: W.H. Freeman (especially Chapter 5 on knowledge representations and Chapter 8 on problem solving).

Bedard, J., & Chi, M.T.H. (1993). Expertise. Current Directions In Psychological Science, 4, 135-139.

emb, G.B., and Ellis, J.A. (1994). Knowledge taught in school: What is remembered? Review of Educational Research, 64, 253-286.

Kosslyn, C.M. (1995). Mental imagery. In S.M. Kosslyn & D.N. Osherson (Eds.), An Invitation to cognitive science. (Vol. 2, pp. 267-296). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Anderson, J.R. (1996/1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Chapter 1 on "Production Systems and ACT" is enough as a good introduction)

Resnick, L.B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 1-20. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49 (4), 294-303.

Perkins, D.N. & Solomon, G. (1989). Are Cognitive Skills Context-bound? Educational Researcher,18, 16-25.

Mellers, B.A., Schwartz, A., & Cooke, A.D.J. (1998). Judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 447-477.

Medin, D.L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469-1481.

Halpern, D.F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. American Psychologist, 53, 449-455.

Learning

Reed, S. K. (2000). Cognition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Baddeley, A. (1998). Human memory. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Ormrod, J. E. (1999). Human learning (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Alexander, P.A., Schallert, D.L., & Hare, V.C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61, 315-343.

Paris, S.G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction, 15-51. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bruner, J. (1988). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In N. Mercer (Ed.), Language and literacy from an educational perspective, Vol. 1, Language studies. Philadelphia: The Open Press.

Franken, R. E. (2002). Human motivation (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Motivation

Bandura, Albert, (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York : W.H. Freeman (especially Chapter 3: "The nature and structure of self efficacy.")

Alternative:
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 122-147.

Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition in educational research. Educational Researcher, 22, 14-22.

Urdan, T.C. & Maehr, M.L. (1995). Beyond a Two-goal Theory of Motivation and Achievement: A Case for Social Goals. Review of Educational Research, 65, 213-243.

Dweck, Carol S; Leggett, Ellen L. (2000). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. In Higgins, E. Tory & Kruglanski, Arie W. (Eds). Motivational science: Social and personality perspectives. Key reading in social psychology. (pp. 394-415).

Elliot, Andrew J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189.

Midgley, Carol; Kaplan, Avi; Middleton, Michael. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 93(1), 77-86.

Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549-571.

Weiner, Bernard; Kukla, Andy. (2000). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. In Higgins, E. Tory & Kruglanski, Arie W. (Eds). Motivational science: Social and personality perspectives. Key readings in social psychology. (pp. 380-393).

Alternative:
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.

Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.

Weiner, B. (1991). Metaphors in Motivation and Attribution. American Psychologist, 46, 921-930.

Psycholinguistics

Schallert, D. L., & Martin, D. B. (in press, 2001). A psychological analysis of what teachers and students do in the language arts classroom. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, & N. Farnan (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts, Vol. II. New York: Macmillan.

Wertsch, J. V. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, pp. 85-100. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Bruner, J. (1981). The pragmatics of acquisition. In W.Deutsch (Ed.), The child’s construction of language. New York: Academic Press.

Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press.

Mehan, H. (1985). The structure of classroom discourse. In van Dijk, T. (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis, Vol. 3. London: Academic Press.

Carlsen, W.S. (1991). Questioning in classrooms: A sociolinguistic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61, 157-178.

Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.

Person, N. K., Kreuz, R. J., Zwaan, R. A., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Pragmatics and pedagogy: Conversational rules and politeness strategies inhibit effective tutoring. Cognition & Instruction, 13, 161-188.

Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the
acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.

Hammer, D. (1995). Student inquiry in a physics class discussion. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 401-430.

Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition & Instruction, 17, 379-432.

Faigley, L. (1986). Competing theories of process: A critique and a proposal. College English, 48, 527-542.

Penrose, A. M., & Geisler, C. (1994) Reading and writing without authority. College Composition and Communication, 45, 505-520.

Instructional Psychology

National Research Council How People Learn. 2000.

Schauble, L., & Glaser, R. (Eds.) (1996) Innovations in learning : new environments for education. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.

Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction, (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.

Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.) (1996). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York : Teachers College Press.

Jonassen, D. H., Land, S. M. (Eds.) (2000). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates, 2000

Advances in Instructional Psychology edited by Robert Glaser, various years.

Annual Review of Psychology. Read the last several chapters on Instructional psychology.

Back to Top